The money shot.
Originally uploaded by Safe in my own skin.
This rips
What's wrong with you people?
...more porn for your horn...
Or for a less contentious commentary you might like this UK site
If you are more technically minded you might like this breakdown of the events leading up to the loudest bang the area ever heard. Or you can screw the truth and have a look at this made up travelogue of a person biking through the radioactive zone.
Cheers to the Ukraine from Australia.
On Thursday in the first week of May, at two minutes and three seconds after 1:00
in the morning, the time and date will be 01:02:03 04/05/06.
This won't happen again for a bloody long time.
You may now return to your normal stuff.
thx fundumper
We've all heard about men having guts or balls. But do you really know the difference between them? In an effort to keep you informed, the definition for each is listed below:
GUTS - Is arriving home late after a night out with the guys, being assaulted by your wife with a broom, and having the guts to ask: "Are you still cleaning, or are you flying somewhere?"
BALLS - Is coming home late after a night out with the guys, smelling of perfume and beer, lipstick on your collar, slapping your wife on the ass and having the balls to say: "You're next."
ahhh What can i say ? Maybe the movie should be called
"Not the Warriors"
A Study in Nutrition - As for as applying his results to human nutrition, Dr. Pottenger said, "While no attempt will be made to correlate the changes in the animals studied with malformations found in humans, the similarity is so obvious that parallel pictures will suggest themselves."
Cats are not humans - Dr. Pottenger observed that cats fed a cooked diet developed a number of pathologies, some of which were remarkably similar to certain diseases of civilization, whereas cats eating raw didn't suffer from these problems. It has thus been tempting to blame cooking for all the food-related evils from which we suffer; and in the raw-food movement, this study has been held up as the quintessential paradigm of proof of the perils of cooked food. However, casting Pottenger's experiment in this role suffers from some weaknesses that we shall examine, some of which are fundamental.